IMT-CDL Home
Organizer Advisory Committee Conference Topics Important Dates Registration Programme Conference Director Contact Us
 

About the Conference

The concept of Workforce Diversity Management is being increasingly promoted as a strategic people management technique by multinational corporations (MNCs) to enhance organizational competitiveness. Many organizations in India have been rolling out domestic-designed Workforce Diversity Management programs to their operations (Dogra, 2009). However, when we talk of domestic-designed initiatives, there is need for managers to look at Workforce Diversity Management from the Indian perspective. India is one of the most diverse nations in the world (Sowell, 2002) and to understand the organizational context for Diversity Management it is important to first understand its societal context (Cooke & Saini, 2010). India must address a range of diversity issues, including age, education, religion, caste, socially disadvantaged (e.g., scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, and other depressed classes), gender, language, regional background, ethnicity, economic well-being, and lifestyle (e.g., vegetarian vs. non-vegetarian) (Som, 2007; Venkata Ratnam Chandra, 1996). Since, India is a multi-religious country, with Hinduism being the dominant religion practiced by 81% of the population (Society for Human Resource Management [SHRM], 2007).

Hundreds of languages are spoken by the Indian people; 18 of them are officially recognized by the Constitution (Ratnam Chandra, 1996). Gender inequality in education is relatively high, even in urban India. In India, women make up around 20% of the workforce in urban areas and religion, caste, and language remain major determinants of social and political organization, despite economic modernization and laws countering discrimination against the lower end of the class structure (SHRM, 2007; Som, 2007).

In addition, managers and other categories of employees, especially those belonging to the higher castes, resent reservation policies and concessions through which socially disadvantaged people may enter organizations (Kundu, 2003). Consequently, despite the fact that three rounds of anti-caste legislation have been passed in India since 1955, caste stratifications continue to play a dominant, though diminishing, and divisive role in governing Indians’ lives (Foster, 2007). This is, to some extent, reflected in organizational life as well. For example, Kundu’s (2003) survey of 1,083 male and female employees across categories regarding their perception of workforce diversity in Indian organizations revealed “the prevalence of gender and category (racial) discrimination” in workplaces.

In this conference attempt will be made to understand the extent to which Diversity Management has been adopted in corporate India to gain competitive advantage and explore how top management in India has been spearheading this concept.

References:

  • Cooke F. Lee & D.S. Saini (2010). Diversity Management in India: A Study of Organizations in Different Ownership Forms and Industrial Sectors. Human Resource Management, Vol 49(3), pp 477-500
  • Dogra. D. (2009). Towards Managing Diversity: Cultural Aspects of Business Environment, Reference Press, New Delhi India.
  • Foster, P. (2007, May 31). 14 dead in riots as divisions in India’s caste system erupt. Daily Telegraph, p. 22.
  • Kundu, S. C. (2003). Workforce diversity status: A study of employees’ reactions. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(4), 215–226.
  • SHRM. (2007). Global HR Library: Worldwatch: India. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http//:www.shrm.org/global/library_published/country/Global World Watch%20-%20
  • Sowell, T. (2002, March 11). Those who gush about “diversity” never want to put their beliefs to the test. The Enterprise, p. 22.
  • Venkata Ratnam, C., & Chandra, V. (1996). Source of diversity and the challenge before human resource management in India. International Journal of Manpower, 17(4/5), 76–108.